Company identity and regulatory role

Starvegas and Its Swiss Licensing Context

Does a casino operator’s identity tell you the same thing as its licence? At Starvegas, the two are connected, but they answer different questions: one identifies the company behind the brand, while the other describes the regulatory setting for its online gambling service.

Starvegas

Choose your game. Join Starvegas.

Join & Play

The recorded operator is Casino Interlaken AG, and the licensing details point to Switzerland. For current account-access terms, https://starvegas-it.eu/ is a sensible place to check, because a licence record is not an account rulebook.

Company identity and regulatory role

Casino Interlaken AG is the legal entity named as the operator behind Starvegas. Its recorded address is Strandbadstrasse 44, CH-3800 Interlaken, Switzerland. That connects the online brand to a particular Swiss company; it does not mean that the company, the brand and the regulator are interchangeable names.

The licence information identifies the Swiss Federal Gaming Board, also known by the acronym ESBK, as both the licensing and supervisory authority. The listed licence number is 516-010-01, and the service type attached to it is online gambling. The record also names Technical Systems Testing (TST) as auditor. These are distinct roles: the operator runs the service, the authority licenses and supervises it, and the auditor is separately identified in the licensing information.

Starvegas

Browse the slots. Find a live table.

Register & Play

The following table separates those roles from the legal framework attached to the record. It shows who or what is named, alongside the specific connection recorded.

Role or framework Recorded name Connection stated
Operator Casino Interlaken AG Legal entity behind Starvegas
Licensing and supervisory authority Swiss Federal Gaming Board (ESBK) Named for licence 516-010-01
Auditor Technical Systems Testing (TST) Listed as auditor
Governing law Switzerland Named as governing law
Dispute jurisdiction Swiss courts Named for dispute resolution

Taken together, these details establish a Swiss institutional context for the online gambling service. They also make the relationship more precise than a general claim that a casino is “Swiss”: the record supplies an operator, a regulator, a licence identifier and a legal framework. It does not, by itself, establish every practical or territorial consequence a reader might associate with those facts.

What the licence context can and cannot tell you

The licence record supports a specific statement: the service is identified as online gambling under a licence associated with the Swiss Federal Gaming Board, with Casino Interlaken AG named as operator. The governing-law and dispute-jurisdiction entries add the stated Swiss legal context. Those are meaningful details about oversight and company identity, but they should not be stretched into a universal answer about who can access an account.

In particular, a Swiss licence entry does not itself spell out whether a person in every country or region may register or use the service. Nor does it state the current checks or account conditions that apply to an individual. Country-level availability and account-level acceptance are related to market context, but they are separate questions from identifying the operator and regulator.

The brand material describes account checks separately from the licence information. It states that verification is required before withdrawal, that KYC is required within 30 days of registration for full account use, and that a pre-verification deposit cap of CHF 1,000 applies over 30 days. These are account-operation details, not additional meanings of licence number 516-010-01. Keeping the categories separate helps avoid treating a regulatory record as if it contained every step or condition for accessing an account.

For the same reason, the licence information alone does not answer questions such as:

  • Whether a particular person’s residence or location is currently eligible for registration.
  • Which documents or checks will be requested in an individual account review.
  • Whether a specific account has met the conditions required for a particular action.

Those questions require the applicable current account terms and the details of the individual situation. The Swiss regulatory connection gives context for who operates the service and under which named framework; it does not replace those operational details.

Reading the market connection accurately

Casino Interlaken AG’s Interlaken address and the Swiss licensing details place the operator within a clearly identified Swiss context. That is a company and oversight connection, rather than proof that the same access rules apply across all markets. A reader can reasonably distinguish the brand’s Swiss operator from the authority that supervises the licensed service, while avoiding assumptions that the record does not make.

So the useful implication is specific, not sweeping: Starvegas is linked to Casino Interlaken AG, and the recorded online gambling licence is associated with Swiss supervision, Swiss governing law and Swiss courts for dispute resolution. For an account-access question, those facts provide background, while current eligibility and account conditions must be considered separately.